Week #9: March 12

Repeating Imperial Anthropology

Topics covered include:
 militarized anthropology  military propaganda  critiques of militarization

Required Readings:

Chapter 3, Price, David, “Faking Scholarship,” pp. 59-76, in: Network of Concerned Anthropologists. (2009). The Counter-Counterinsurgency Manual: Or, Notes on Demilitarizing American Society. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Chapter 4, Feldman, Greg, “Radical or Reactionary?” pp. 77-93, in: Network of Concerned Anthropologists. (2009). The Counter-Counterinsurgency Manual: Or, Notes on Demilitarizing American Society. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Chapter 7, Bickford, Andrew, “Anthropology and HUMINT,” pp. 135-151, in: Network of Concerned Anthropologists. (2009). The Counter-Counterinsurgency Manual: Or, Notes on Demilitarizing American Society. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

Chapter 8, Lin, Kanhong, “About Face!” pp. 153-169, in: Network of Concerned Anthropologists. (2009). The Counter-Counterinsurgency Manual: Or, Notes on Demilitarizing American Society. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

» Structured outline (worth 5%): please send via email, as an attachment in .odt, .doc., .docx, or .pdf to: maximilian.forte@concordia.ca, by the end of the day.

» Presentations, peer review (worth 10%): Five students presenting for this session, commentary and questions expected from seminar participants.

Optional Readings in the New Imperialism Course Pack on Reserve:

Department of the Army, U.S. (2006). Counterinsurgency Field Manual, FM 3-24/MCWP 3-33.5. (Washington, D.C.: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2006) – Ch. 3, “Intelligence in Counterinsurgency,” 3-1—3-35

Roberto J. GONZÁLEZ.
(2007). Towards mercenary anthropology?  US Counterinsurgency Field Manual 3-24 and the military-anthropology complex. Anthropology Today, 23 (3): 14-19.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (U.S.). (2008). Broad Agency Announcement Number W911NF-08-R-0007 (Solicitation of grant proposals for the Minerva Research Initiative).

Priya SATIA. (2008). The forgotten history of knowledge and power in British Iraq, or why Minerva’s owl cannot fly. Social Science Research Council: The Minerva Controversy, October 17.

Conor GEARTY. (2008). Skewing scholarship. Social Science Research Council: The Minerva Controversy, October 9.

Additional Resources: